Your agent spend is real. Your visibility into it isn't.
For finance and FinOps — where the agent money actually goes.
Spend grows faster than anyone forecast, and the bill doesn't break down by model, agent, or person. You can't tell efficient spend from waste, or how much of it flows through agents you don't control.
A bill with no breakdown.
One total at the end of the month is not a cost program. It's a number you can't question, defend, or reduce.
No attribution
Spend doesn't split by model, agent, user, or provider, so you can't see which choices are driving the curve.
Estimated or real?
Token-derived estimates and billed amounts blur together, so finance can't tell which numbers to trust.
Risk-blind spend
You can't see how much money runs through ungoverned or risky agents — the spend you'd most want to question.
Spend you can attribute, trust, and reduce.
Attribution four ways
Cost by model, agent, user, and provider — so every line of the bill has a cause you can act on.
Governance-tagged spend
See exactly how much flows through risky or ungoverned agents, and watch it fall as you bring them under control.
Model efficiency
Cost per thousand tokens by model surfaces the obvious re-routing wins, including what caching already saves you.
Budget vs. actual vs. forecast
A run-rate projection against budget, so you see a breach coming instead of explaining it afterward.
Put a cause behind every dollar.
Attribution, efficiency, and forecast — for spend you can actually manage.