c16
Site
Page

A pile of risks isn't a worklist.

For the CISO — the prioritized queue of what agents did wrong, and what to fix first.

Behavioral risk shows up scattered across tools, with no order and no owner. You can't tell which finding matters most, and a finding on an agent you don't control can't be enforced anyway.

The pain

Risk without ranking.

When every issue looks equal, the team works the loudest one — not the one that actually reduces exposure.

No priority

Severity alone doesn't tell you where to start. A high finding on a contained agent can matter less than a medium on a dangerous one.

Unenforceable findings

A finding on an ungoverned agent has nothing to enforce against. It clutters the queue without a path to closure.

No tie to controls

Findings that don't map to a framework can't become evidence, and can't be explained to an auditor or the board.

How findings resolves it

One queue, ranked by what you can act on.

1.

Rank by enforceability, then severity

Findings on ungoverned agents jump the queue — govern the agent first, and the rest of its findings become enforceable.

2.

Map every finding to a framework

Each behavior ties to OWASP LLM, MITRE ATLAS, or NIST AI RMF, so the worklist doubles as control evidence.

3.

Show the score impact

Each item carries the points you'd recover by fixing it, so the highest-leverage work is unambiguous.

2
high-severity findings open
7
behavioral findings total
3
control frameworks mapped
Rank
by enforceability, then severity

Work the findings that move the needle.

Ranked by what you can enforce, mapped to the controls you report on.