c16
Site
Page

Every cost, risk, and finding gets a name.

An accountability rollup by owner — agents, cost, risk, and findings per person — with sensitive-data access by identity.

A problem with no owner is just a shrug. The teams and users surface attributes the fleet to the people behind it, so cost debates, risk reviews, and audit questions all start with a name instead of a search.

The pain

Cost, risk, and findings have no owner.

Compliance needs accountability for the audit; the executive needs it for the budget. Today both inherit a fleet where spend and exposure float free of the people who created them.

A problem with no owner is a shrug

When a finding or a cost spike has no name attached, no one is responsible for closing it. Accountability requires a person, not a process.

You can't see who touched sensitive data

Agents read protected files under some identity. If that identity is a static key or a consumer alias, you can't tie the access back to a person who answers for it.

Accountability is scattered across tools

Cost lives in billing, risk lives in security, findings live in GRC. Assembling a per-person picture means reconciling three systems by hand.

How the accountability rollup resolves it

One owner view that carries spend, risk, and exposure together.

Agents, cost, risk, and findings per person

Each owner is a single row: the agents they run, the spend they drive, the risk they carry, and the findings attributed to them. Accountability in one line.

Sensitive-data access by identity

See which identity touched which protected paths. Where the identity is unverified or consumer-aliased, it's flagged — exposure you can name and challenge.

Chargeable status

Spend is marked chargeable or unattributed. Proxy-only and identity-less usage surfaces explicitly, so chargeback debates happen with names attached.

Shared by compliance and the executive

The same rollup answers the auditor's 'who is responsible' and the board's 'who owns the bill' — one source, two questions resolved.

Unattributed usage is visible, not hidden

Spend with no identity behind it isn't quietly absorbed. It's surfaced as its own line, because the gap in accountability is itself a finding.

From rollup to detail in a click

Open an owner to see their agents, their sensitive-path access, and their findings — the evidence behind the row, on demand.

The story in numbers

What the accountability rollup makes legible.

$684.5
total spend, attributed by owner
8
agents rolled up to the people who run them
2
high findings, each assigned to an owner

Put a name behind every cost and finding.

See agents, cost, risk, and findings per owner — with sensitive-data access and chargeable status attached.