Executive · Seat home
Is our use of AI agents safe, controlled, and worth it?
Fleet posture 76/100 (target ≥ 80), up 18 pts over 6 weeks — control is on track to 80 in ~2 weeks. 63% of the fleet is under full control (5/8 governed & monitored), but 2 agents are compound risk and $290.50 (42%) of spend flows through risky or ungoverned agents. Projected month $3.5k vs $3.0k budget.
Fleet posture
4 pts below target · ~2w to 80
Control coverage
5 of 8 governed & monitored
Spend · projected
▲ $3.5k proj · 16% over budget
Compound risk
dangerous & unaccountable
Fleet posture today
target ≥ 804 pts to go
average across 7 instrumented agents
target 80 · 1 shadow agent excluded (no telemetry to score)
Posture & value trajectory — 6 weeks
~2w to 80Up 18 pts over the window. At the recent pace, the fleet reaches the 80 target in ~2 weeks.
The 76 index is an average — 1 Critical and 3 Elevated agents sit behind it. Spend rose 62% across the window while posture climbed — control is improving despite growth.
Your surfaces
Governance & ROI Board
The one-glance board view — posture, ROI, and what is driving risk.
Fleet Overview
Every agent as an actor — governed, instrumented, and spending.
Security Posture
How safe the fleet is and which agents drag the score down.
Cost Center
What every agent costs — and whether the spend is attributable.
Compliance
Framework coverage and the open findings on the board.
Policy & Enforcement
Close the gap — govern unbound agents and set spend ceilings.
Do next
Derived from app/data/c16-fleet.ts: agents · costs · fleetPostureScore · controlCoverage · governanceTaggedSpend · compoundRiskAgents · shadowCount · postureIndexTrend · weeksToTarget · findings.