Executive · Governance & ROI Board
One board view of AI-agent governance — posture, spend, and what's at risk.
The single surface to take to a board or leadership review: are we governing our AI agents, is it improving, and how much spend is exposed? Packages signals scattered across the operator views into one trended, exportable read.
Bottom line
Governance index 76/100 (target 80), up 2 this period. 63% of agents are governed and $290.50 (42%) of spend flows through risky or ungoverned agents — concentrated in support-copilot.
Reporting period
Governance index
76
of 100 · target ≥ 80 · ▲ 2 vs last period
Governed agents
63%
5 of 8 agents policy-bound
Spend at risk
$290.50
42% of $684.50 flows through risky / ungoverned agents
2
open high findings
across the fleet
1
critical agents
posture < 50
88%
instrumentation coverage
1 shadow agent
$684.50
total AI spend
54% from cache
Governance index — 6-week trend
posture history (projected)Up 2 pts this period. At the recent pace, the fleet reaches the 80 target in ~2 weeks.
Spend — daily
$684.50 totalWhat's driving the risk & spend
agents below the posture target, ranked by spendOpen high & medium findings
all findings →Fields: fleetPostureScore · governed · cost · costs.series · findings(severity) — from app/data/c16-fleet.ts. Posture history is projected (qcontrol stores current state only).