Security · Posture
How safe the fleet is — the score, what lowers it, and where it heads.
The board read on agent safety: one score, the factors dragging it down, and the agents to harden first.
Bottom line
Fleet posture 76/100 (target 80). Biggest drag: No tool-approval policy (−10 each, 5 agents). Worst agent: marketing-gpt (25). Hardening those moves the score most.
76
fleet posture score
target ≥ 80
1
critical agents
score < 50
88%
instrumented coverage
7/8 agents
1
shadow installs
installed, unmonitored
Fleet posture score
instrumented agents · target ≥ 804
Hardened
3
At risk
1
Critical
What lowers the score
risk factors across the fleetPosture regression — current vs worst observed
agents that have been worse than they are nowCritical & at-risk agents
score < 80 · lowest firstAt-rest installations — coverage
4/5 instrumented · 1 unmonitoredFields: security_score · factors · worst_score · worst_factors · danger_level · instrumented · installations — from app/data/c16-fleet.ts (qcontrol /api shape). Score = 100 − sum of FACTOR_PTS deductions.