This session should read like one coherent risk story: who ran it, what it touched, where it went, and why it deserves attention now.

Identity is only part of the trust picture

The user is known, but the session still relies on shared infrastructure that widens the interpretation problem.

Known actor does not mean low consequence.

The meaningful moment is a combination

Sensitive file access matters more because it happened adjacent to outbound model traffic.

This is why a meaning layer helps more than a flat timeline.

Containment choices are visible

Security can suspend the key or isolate the endpoint without waiting for every turn row to be reviewed.

The page should expose the fastest levers clearly.

Verify the shared key owner

Decide whether the key use is expected or whether credential scope should be reduced immediately.

Confirm the endpoint story

Bind the host to an owner and environment posture so future sessions start with a stronger trust floor.

Replay the outbound segment

Use the raw timeline to verify whether the boundary crossing matches the expected work pattern.

Identity bundle

alice@company.com on alice-mbp.local using Claude Code with a shared org key.

Good enough to explain the actor, not enough to close the trust question.

Sensitive context bundle

The working directory and touched files place the session inside auth-related company code.

This raises consequence even if the traffic pattern looks routine.

Execution bundle

High tool volume and repeated file operations show the work was active and consequential, not incidental.

This helps explain why the session is not background noise.

Boundary bundle

External model traffic follows the sensitive file activity in the same session window.

The order makes the session worth reviewing first.